Guyana vs Romania: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Romania
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 881.52 1000 USD against 873.37 1000 USD in Romania, a difference of 8.15 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 63rd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,146 1000 USD | 323.68 1000 USD | 822.78 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 1,028 1000 USD | 504.41 1000 USD | 523.92 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 866.76 1000 USD | 1,342 1000 USD | 474.96 1000 USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Guyana or Romania?
- Guyana, at 881.52 1000 USD against 873.37 1000 USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Guyana and Romania?
- 8.15 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Romania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Romania rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Guyana ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 63rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf