Iceland vs Togo: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Iceland
- Togo
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 3.87 1000 USD against 3.63 1000 USD in Togo, a difference of 0.24 1000 USD.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Togo ahead.
Iceland ranks 163rd and Togo ranks 164th of 194 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.65 1000 USD | 454.19 1000 USD | 342.54 1000 USD | Togo |
| 2010s | 3.97 1000 USD | 3,825 1000 USD | 3,822 1000 USD | Togo |
| 2020s | 4.25 1000 USD | 1,555 1000 USD | 1,551 1000 USD | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Iceland or Togo?
- Iceland, at 3.87 1000 USD against 3.63 1000 USD in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Iceland and Togo?
- 0.24 1000 USD, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Togo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Togo rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Iceland ranks 163rd and Togo ranks 164th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf