Iraq vs Kyrgyzstan: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Iraq
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 83.44 1000 USD against 69.52 1000 USD in Iraq, a difference of 13.92 1000 USD.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 106th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 180 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 238.91 1000 USD | 4.11 1000 USD | 234.8 1000 USD | Iraq |
| 2020s | 258.97 1000 USD | 42.05 1000 USD | 216.91 1000 USD | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Iraq or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 83.44 1000 USD against 69.52 1000 USD in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Iraq and Kyrgyzstan?
- 13.92 1000 USD, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kyrgyzstan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Iraq ranks 106th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf