Jamaica vs Malawi: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Jamaica
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1,339 1000 USD against 1,335 1000 USD in Jamaica, a difference of 4 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 51st of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,234 1000 USD | 1,443 1000 USD | 1,791 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 2,356 1000 USD | 4,982 1000 USD | 2,626 1000 USD | Malawi |
| 2020s | 2,455 1000 USD | 693.55 1000 USD | 1,761 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Jamaica or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 1,339 1000 USD against 1,335 1000 USD in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Jamaica and Malawi?
- 4 1000 USD, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Jamaica ranks 52nd and Malawi ranks 51st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf