Kuwait vs Latvia: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Kuwait
- Latvia
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 55.78 1000 USD against 54.63 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 1.15 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 115th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 150.36 1000 USD | 13.01 1000 USD | 137.34 1000 USD | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 235.43 1000 USD | 200.99 1000 USD | 34.44 1000 USD | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 63.69 1000 USD | 220.73 1000 USD | 157.03 1000 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Kuwait or Latvia?
- Kuwait, at 55.78 1000 USD against 54.63 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Kuwait and Latvia?
- 1.15 1000 USD, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Latvia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Latvia rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Kuwait ranks 115th and Latvia ranks 117th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf