Libya vs Tonga: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Libya
- Tonga
How they compare
Libya currently reports 68.71 1000 USD against 61.7 1000 USD in Tonga, a difference of 7.01 1000 USD.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tonga ahead.
Libya ranks 112th and Tonga ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 980.72 1000 USD | 187.49 1000 USD | 793.23 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2010s | 545.75 1000 USD | 8.69 1000 USD | 537.06 1000 USD | Libya |
| 2020s | 160.73 1000 USD | 61.7 1000 USD | 99.03 1000 USD | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Libya or Tonga?
- Libya, at 68.71 1000 USD against 61.7 1000 USD in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Libya and Tonga?
- 7.01 1000 USD, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Libya and Tonga rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Libya ranks 112th and Tonga ranks 114th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf