Paraguay vs Sweden: Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value
Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value over time
- Paraguay
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 4,165 1000 USD against 4,144 1000 USD in Paraguay, a difference of 21 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sweden ahead.
Paraguay ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 139.19 1000 USD | 1,851 1000 USD | 1,712 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1,739 1000 USD | 3,288 1000 USD | 1,549 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2020s | 4,159 1000 USD | 4,435 1000 USD | 276.11 1000 USD | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value, Paraguay or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 4,165 1000 USD against 4,144 1000 USD in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value between Paraguay and Sweden?
- 21 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sweden?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Paraguay and Sweden rank globally for other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — import value?
- Paraguay ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Other potassic fertilizers, n.e.c. — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf