Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Exposure to outdoor air pollution

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
9.9 µg/m³
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
10.2 µg/m³
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
169th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
167th

Exposure to outdoor air pollution over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
02.557.51012.5199820112024

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 10.2 µg/m³ against 9.9 µg/m³ in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.3 µg/m³.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 169th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 167th of 241 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 10.1 µg/m³ 10.25 µg/m³ 0.15 µg/m³ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 9.48 µg/m³ 10.2 µg/m³ 0.72 µg/m³ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 9.86 µg/m³ 10.37 µg/m³ 0.51 µg/m³ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 9.58 µg/m³ 10.2 µg/m³ 0.62 µg/m³ Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exposure to outdoor air pollution, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 10.2 µg/m³ against 9.9 µg/m³ in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2024.
What is the difference in exposure to outdoor air pollution between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.3 µg/m³, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for exposure to outdoor air pollution?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 169th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 167th of 241 countries.
Where does this data come from?
SatPM, Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group, Washington University in St. Louis (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Exposure to outdoor air pollution. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Exposure to outdoor air pollution. Statizoid, drawing on SatPM, Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group, Washington University in St. Louis (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outdoor-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outdoor-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Exposure to outdoor air pollution</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exposure to outdoor air pollution
Unit
µg/m³
Source
SatPM, Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group, Washington University in St. Louis (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
241 places, 6,507 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

Annual population-weighted average concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air, measured in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³). Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, which can pose significant health risks.