Burundi vs Ecuador: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 42.65 kg/ha against 41.56 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 1.09 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 94th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20 kg/ha | 23.24 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 18.41 kg/ha | 21.59 kg/ha | 3.18 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 20.49 kg/ha | 22.83 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 22.01 kg/ha | 25.58 kg/ha | 3.58 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 20.99 kg/ha | 35.37 kg/ha | 14.38 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 24.48 kg/ha | 42.78 kg/ha | 18.3 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 42.96 kg/ha | 46.4 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 42.65 kg/ha against 41.56 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Ecuador?
- 1.09 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Ecuador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Ecuador rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 94th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).