Czechia vs Serbia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Serbia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 85.2 kg/ha against 84.05 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 1.15 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Czechia ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.22 kg/ha | 61.28 kg/ha | 10.94 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 80.78 kg/ha | 70.93 kg/ha | 9.86 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 84.95 kg/ha | 79.22 kg/ha | 5.73 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Czechia or Serbia?
- Czechia, at 85.2 kg/ha against 84.05 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Czechia and Serbia?
- 1.15 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Serbia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).