Estonia vs Malawi: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 48.59 kg/ha against 46.13 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 2.46 kg/ha.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Estonia ranks 84th and Malawi ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.19 kg/ha | 21.91 kg/ha | 7.72 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 27.68 kg/ha | 27.09 kg/ha | 0.5883 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 43.62 kg/ha | 40.39 kg/ha | 3.23 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 54.42 kg/ha | 48.01 kg/ha | 6.41 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 48.59 kg/ha against 46.13 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Malawi?
- 2.46 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Malawi rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 84th and Malawi ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).