Japan vs Myanmar: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Japan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Japan currently reports 57.13 kg/ha against 56.95 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 60th and Myanmar ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 69.43 kg/ha | 13.6 kg/ha | 55.83 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 60.39 kg/ha | 16.32 kg/ha | 44.06 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 59.7 kg/ha | 26.27 kg/ha | 33.42 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 57.32 kg/ha | 32.92 kg/ha | 24.41 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 56.84 kg/ha | 57.26 kg/ha | 0.4203 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 56.44 kg/ha | 62.48 kg/ha | 6.04 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 57.54 kg/ha | 57.9 kg/ha | 0.3655 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Japan or Myanmar?
- Japan, at 57.13 kg/ha against 56.95 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Japan and Myanmar?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Myanmar rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Japan ranks 60th and Myanmar ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).