Kyrgyzstan vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 33.73 kg/ha against 32.62 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.11 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 111th and Russian Federation ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.68 kg/ha | 14.2 kg/ha | 11.49 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 33.99 kg/ha | 16.26 kg/ha | 17.73 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 34.4 kg/ha | 21.84 kg/ha | 12.56 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.91 kg/ha | 30.92 kg/ha | 3.98 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Russian Federation?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 33.73 kg/ha against 32.62 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
- 1.11 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 111th and Russian Federation ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).