Lesotho vs Libya: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Libya
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 7.35 kg/ha against 5.97 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 1.38 kg/ha.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 197th and Libya ranks 199th of 201 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.37 kg/ha | 2.16 kg/ha | 8.21 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 10.78 kg/ha | 3.22 kg/ha | 7.56 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 9.07 kg/ha | 4.95 kg/ha | 4.12 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 9.08 kg/ha | 4.85 kg/ha | 4.23 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 7.42 kg/ha | 5.5 kg/ha | 1.92 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 7.52 kg/ha | 6.51 kg/ha | 1 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 6.97 kg/ha | 5.99 kg/ha | 0.9735 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Lesotho or Libya?
- Lesotho, at 7.35 kg/ha against 5.97 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Lesotho and Libya?
- 1.38 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Libya rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 197th and Libya ranks 199th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).