Mali vs Panama: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Mali
- Panama
How they compare
Mali currently reports 29.47 kg/ha against 27.57 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 1.9 kg/ha.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 129th and Panama ranks 131st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.11 kg/ha | 16.02 kg/ha | 0.09 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 17.55 kg/ha | 23.41 kg/ha | 5.86 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1980s | 22.28 kg/ha | 23.55 kg/ha | 1.28 kg/ha | Panama |
| 1990s | 23.36 kg/ha | 20.79 kg/ha | 2.57 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 18.78 kg/ha | 21.33 kg/ha | 2.55 kg/ha | Panama |
| 2010s | 27.38 kg/ha | 25.17 kg/ha | 2.21 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 27.75 kg/ha | 31.87 kg/ha | 4.11 kg/ha | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mali or Panama?
- Mali, at 29.47 kg/ha against 27.57 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mali and Panama?
- 1.9 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Panama rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Mali ranks 129th and Panama ranks 131st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).