Spain vs Uganda: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Spain
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 23.98 kg/ha against 23.03 kg/ha in Spain, a difference of 0.95 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Spain ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 129th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.84 kg/ha | 17.15 kg/ha | 2.31 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 18.42 kg/ha | 20.83 kg/ha | 2.42 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 24.12 kg/ha | 14.05 kg/ha | 10.07 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 26.11 kg/ha | 17.96 kg/ha | 8.15 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 31.88 kg/ha | 20.93 kg/ha | 10.95 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 34.02 kg/ha | 20.22 kg/ha | 13.8 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 34.49 kg/ha | 25.03 kg/ha | 9.46 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Spain or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 23.98 kg/ha against 23.03 kg/ha in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Spain and Uganda?
- 0.95 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Uganda rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Spain ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 129th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).