Tuvalu vs Zimbabwe: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Tuvalu
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 22.31 kg/ha against 22.1 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Tuvalu ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Tuvalu averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tuvalu | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.22 kg/ha | 29.95 kg/ha | 0.7293 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 21.27 kg/ha | 33.53 kg/ha | 12.25 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 22.38 kg/ha | 30.13 kg/ha | 7.75 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 15.91 kg/ha | 22.02 kg/ha | 6.1 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 17.51 kg/ha | 18.05 kg/ha | 0.5434 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 17.84 kg/ha | 15.48 kg/ha | 2.36 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 23.59 kg/ha | 21.64 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Tuvalu or Zimbabwe?
- Tuvalu, at 22.31 kg/ha against 22.1 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Tuvalu and Zimbabwe?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tuvalu and Zimbabwe rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Tuvalu ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).