Afghanistan vs Uruguay: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 130,753 t against 125,135 t in Uruguay, a difference of 5,618 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78,198 t | 20,376 t | 57,822 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 89,951 t | 22,867 t | 67,083 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 73,889 t | 26,236 t | 47,653 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 71,862 t | 33,495 t | 38,366 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 94,244 t | 66,814 t | 27,430 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 129,989 t | 198,079 t | 68,090 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 129,880 t | 177,577 t | 47,697 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Uruguay?
- Afghanistan, at 130,753 t against 125,135 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Uruguay?
- 5,618 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Uruguay rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 76th and Uruguay ranks 79th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).