Armenia vs Congo: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Armenia
10,822 t
in 2023
Congo
11,452 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
141st
Congo rank
140th

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Armenia
  • Congo
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 11,452 t against 10,822 t in Armenia, a difference of 630 t.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 141st and Congo ranks 140th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 8,798 t 6,268 t 2,530 t Armenia
2000s 11,762 t 8,095 t 3,666 t Armenia
2010s 14,916 t 10,409 t 4,507 t Armenia
2020s 9,660 t 11,378 t 1,718 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Congo?
Congo, at 11,452 t against 10,822 t in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Congo?
630 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Congo rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Armenia ranks 141st and Congo ranks 140th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).