Armenia vs Liberia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Armenia
10,822 t
in 2023
Liberia
9,987 t
in 2023
Armenia rank
141st
Liberia rank
142nd

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Armenia
  • Liberia
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 10,822 t against 9,987 t in Liberia, a difference of 835 t.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 141st and Liberia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Liberia Difference Ahead
1990s 8,798 t 5,419 t 3,379 t Armenia
2000s 11,762 t 7,576 t 4,186 t Armenia
2010s 14,916 t 9,401 t 5,514 t Armenia
2020s 9,660 t 10,035 t 375.41 t Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Liberia?
Armenia, at 10,822 t against 9,987 t in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Liberia?
835 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Liberia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Liberia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Armenia ranks 141st and Liberia ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).