Azerbaijan vs Chile: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Azerbaijan
- Chile
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 89,954 t against 87,612 t in Chile, a difference of 2,342 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 90th and Chile ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39,134 t | 82,914 t | 43,780 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 56,302 t | 95,301 t | 38,999 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 70,830 t | 107,079 t | 36,250 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 91,481 t | 92,307 t | 826.27 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Chile?
- Azerbaijan, at 89,954 t against 87,612 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Chile?
- 2,342 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Chile?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Chile rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Azerbaijan ranks 90th and Chile ranks 93rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).