Bangladesh vs Germany: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bangladesh
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 1.09 million t against 997,029 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 96,321 t.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 256,943 t | 621,932 t | 364,989 t | Germany |
| 1970s | 295,059 t | 749,432 t | 454,373 t | Germany |
| 1980s | 383,686 t | 875,786 t | 492,101 t | Germany |
| 1990s | 464,165 t | 994,629 t | 530,463 t | Germany |
| 2000s | 632,529 t | 1.16 million t | 526,331 t | Germany |
| 2010s | 837,948 t | 1.14 million t | 306,401 t | Germany |
| 2020s | 958,092 t | 1.09 million t | 133,371 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Germany?
- Germany, at 1.09 million t against 997,029 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Germany?
- 96,321 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Germany?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Germany rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Bangladesh ranks 20th and Germany ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).