Botswana vs Kiribati: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Botswana
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2,968 t against 2,355 t in Botswana, a difference of 613 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 163rd and Kiribati ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Kiribati in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,306 t | 998.71 t | 307.44 t | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1,858 t | 1,067 t | 791.71 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1,536 t | 1,493 t | 43.28 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 1,370 t | 1,394 t | 24.01 t | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 1,374 t | 2,041 t | 666.92 t | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 1,689 t | 2,917 t | 1,227 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 3,050 t | 2,821 t | 229.02 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Botswana or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 2,968 t against 2,355 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Botswana and Kiribati?
- 613 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Kiribati rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Botswana ranks 163rd and Kiribati ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).