Burkina Faso vs Guatemala: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burkina Faso
- Guatemala
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 200,904 t against 184,371 t in Guatemala, a difference of 16,533 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Guatemala ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,553 t | 33,992 t | 9,440 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 28,834 t | 57,139 t | 28,305 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 44,999 t | 66,889 t | 21,890 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 71,575 t | 92,889 t | 21,313 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 114,507 t | 123,018 t | 8,511 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 162,589 t | 180,255 t | 17,666 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 192,066 t | 182,507 t | 9,559 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Burkina Faso or Guatemala?
- Burkina Faso, at 200,904 t against 184,371 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
- 16,533 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Guatemala rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Guatemala ranks 57th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).