Burundi vs Latvia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 72,273 t against 69,456 t in Burundi, a difference of 2,817 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,173 t | 23,791 t | 4,381 t | Burundi |
| 2000s | 28,206 t | 31,398 t | 3,192 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 35,688 t | 59,543 t | 23,856 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 70,130 t | 81,304 t | 11,174 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 72,273 t against 69,456 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and Latvia?
- 2,817 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Latvia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 89th and Latvia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).