Congo vs Slovenia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Congo
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 11,805 t against 11,452 t in Congo, a difference of 353 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Congo ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,268 t | 10,123 t | 3,855 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 8,095 t | 10,605 t | 2,510 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 10,409 t | 11,183 t | 774.08 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 11,378 t | 12,121 t | 743.12 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Congo or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 11,805 t against 11,452 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Congo and Slovenia?
- 353 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Slovenia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Congo ranks 140th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).