Costa Rica vs Estonia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Costa Rica
- Estonia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 37,279 t against 32,986 t in Estonia, a difference of 4,293 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 119th and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,438 t | 13,498 t | 18,941 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 36,274 t | 17,068 t | 19,206 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 41,740 t | 29,190 t | 12,550 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 39,038 t | 38,495 t | 543.42 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Costa Rica or Estonia?
- Costa Rica, at 37,279 t against 32,986 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 4,293 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Estonia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Costa Rica ranks 119th and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).