Cuba vs Tajikistan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Cuba
60,452 t
in 2023
Tajikistan
63,954 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
107th
Tajikistan rank
105th

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Cuba
  • Tajikistan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 63,954 t against 60,452 t in Cuba, a difference of 3,502 t.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 107th and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 201 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 175,478 t 34,314 t 141,165 t Cuba
2000s 128,035 t 46,867 t 81,168 t Cuba
2010s 109,571 t 56,841 t 52,730 t Cuba
2020s 70,439 t 63,728 t 6,711 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 63,954 t against 60,452 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Tajikistan?
3,502 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tajikistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Tajikistan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Cuba ranks 107th and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).