Cuba vs Togo: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 60,452 t against 59,287 t in Togo, a difference of 1,165 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 107th and Togo ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 174,053 t | 10,052 t | 164,001 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 237,047 t | 10,983 t | 226,065 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 282,279 t | 14,931 t | 267,348 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 203,677 t | 24,076 t | 179,601 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 128,035 t | 28,424 t | 99,611 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 109,571 t | 40,974 t | 68,597 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 70,439 t | 54,627 t | 15,812 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Cuba or Togo?
- Cuba, at 60,452 t against 59,287 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Cuba and Togo?
- 1,165 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Cuba ranks 107th and Togo ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).