Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 102,740 t against 89,864 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12,876 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 58,744 t | 34,861 t | 23,884 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 55,178 t | 58,017 t | 2,839 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 61,409 t | 75,281 t | 13,872 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 76,561 t | 70,351 t | 6,210 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 90,606 t | 70,535 t | 20,071 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 106,379 t | 63,330 t | 43,050 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 112,298 t | 88,124 t | 24,174 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Ecuador, at 102,740 t against 89,864 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 12,876 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Ecuador ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).