El Salvador vs Ireland: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Ireland
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 46,588 t against 42,678 t in Ireland, a difference of 3,910 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.
El Salvador ranks 113th and Ireland ranks 115th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Ireland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,202 t | 32,871 t | 9,669 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 35,786 t | 35,837 t | 50.97 t | Ireland |
| 1980s | 32,171 t | 45,598 t | 13,427 t | Ireland |
| 1990s | 36,867 t | 43,675 t | 6,808 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 41,970 t | 46,794 t | 4,823 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 46,300 t | 48,480 t | 2,180 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 47,276 t | 46,666 t | 610.2 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Ireland?
- El Salvador, at 46,588 t against 42,678 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Ireland?
- 3,910 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ireland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Ireland rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 113th and Ireland ranks 115th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).