El Salvador vs Tunisia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- El Salvador
- Tunisia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 46,588 t against 41,238 t in Tunisia, a difference of 5,350 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23,202 t | 22,956 t | 245.98 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 35,786 t | 31,493 t | 4,293 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 32,171 t | 36,394 t | 4,223 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 36,867 t | 52,563 t | 15,695 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 41,970 t | 53,926 t | 11,956 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 46,300 t | 61,723 t | 15,423 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 47,276 t | 58,416 t | 11,139 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, El Salvador or Tunisia?
- El Salvador, at 46,588 t against 41,238 t in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between El Salvador and Tunisia?
- 5,350 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Tunisia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- El Salvador ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 116th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).