Eritrea vs Jordan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Eritrea
6,934 t
in 2023
Jordan
8,727 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
152nd
Jordan rank
149th

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Eritrea
  • Jordan
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 8,727 t against 6,934 t in Eritrea, a difference of 1,793 t.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jordan ahead.

Eritrea ranks 152nd and Jordan ranks 149th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 5,689 t 4,638 t 1,051 t Eritrea
2000s 5,573 t 5,827 t 254.28 t Jordan
2010s 6,788 t 7,840 t 1,052 t Jordan
2020s 6,925 t 8,413 t 1,488 t Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Eritrea or Jordan?
Jordan, at 8,727 t against 6,934 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Eritrea and Jordan?
1,793 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jordan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Jordan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Eritrea ranks 152nd and Jordan ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).