Eswatini vs Guyana: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Eswatini
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 25,273 t against 22,759 t in Eswatini, a difference of 2,514 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 117th and Guyana ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,247 t | 17,034 t | 11,787 t | Guyana |
| 1970s | 9,500 t | 18,074 t | 8,574 t | Guyana |
| 1980s | 16,247 t | 16,815 t | 567.34 t | Guyana |
| 1990s | 17,548 t | 17,986 t | 438.14 t | Guyana |
| 2000s | 19,234 t | 19,347 t | 113.21 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 22,218 t | 23,598 t | 1,380 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 22,669 t | 24,715 t | 2,047 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Eswatini or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 25,273 t against 22,759 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Eswatini and Guyana?
- 2,514 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Eswatini ranks 117th and Guyana ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).