Ethiopia PDR vs Zambia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 142,429 t against 141,918 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 511 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 72nd and Zambia ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 113,460 t | 14,792 t | 98,668 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 123,265 t | 24,213 t | 99,052 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 148,131 t | 26,639 t | 121,492 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 155,819 t | 26,596 t | 129,223 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 142,429 t against 141,918 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Zambia?
- 511 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Zambia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 72nd and Zambia ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).