Finland vs Tajikistan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Finland
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 67,985 t against 63,954 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 4,031 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 104th and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72,082 t | 34,314 t | 37,768 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 85,708 t | 46,867 t | 38,841 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 77,882 t | 56,841 t | 21,041 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 70,469 t | 63,728 t | 6,741 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Finland or Tajikistan?
- Finland, at 67,985 t against 63,954 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Finland and Tajikistan?
- 4,031 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Tajikistan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Finland ranks 104th and Tajikistan ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).