Guatemala vs Morocco: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Morocco
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 184,371 t against 170,824 t in Morocco, a difference of 13,547 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.
Guatemala ranks 64th and Morocco ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33,992 t | 85,150 t | 51,157 t | Morocco |
| 1970s | 57,139 t | 111,790 t | 54,652 t | Morocco |
| 1980s | 66,889 t | 137,390 t | 70,501 t | Morocco |
| 1990s | 92,889 t | 156,383 t | 63,494 t | Morocco |
| 2000s | 123,018 t | 173,336 t | 50,319 t | Morocco |
| 2010s | 180,255 t | 227,038 t | 46,784 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 182,507 t | 181,810 t | 697.25 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Morocco?
- Guatemala, at 184,371 t against 170,824 t in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Morocco?
- 13,547 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Morocco?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Morocco rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 64th and Morocco ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).