Iceland vs Maldives: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iceland
- Maldives
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 171.25 t against 113.31 t in Maldives, a difference of 57.94 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.
Iceland ranks 188th and Maldives ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.13 t | 220.28 t | 196.15 t | Maldives |
| 1970s | 25.33 t | 235.85 t | 210.53 t | Maldives |
| 1980s | 38.89 t | 316.79 t | 277.9 t | Maldives |
| 1990s | 36.26 t | 252.06 t | 215.8 t | Maldives |
| 2000s | 43.47 t | 352.89 t | 309.42 t | Maldives |
| 2010s | 93.65 t | 168.79 t | 75.14 t | Maldives |
| 2020s | 173.48 t | 140.83 t | 32.65 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Iceland or Maldives?
- Iceland, at 171.25 t against 113.31 t in Maldives as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Iceland and Maldives?
- 57.94 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Maldives rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Iceland ranks 188th and Maldives ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).