Ireland vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ireland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 42,678 t against 38,683 t in South Sudan, a difference of 3,995 t.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 115th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48,643 t | 30,894 t | 17,749 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 46,666 t | 36,544 t | 10,122 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Ireland or South Sudan?
- Ireland, at 42,678 t against 38,683 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Ireland and South Sudan?
- 3,995 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Ireland ranks 115th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).