Kazakhstan vs Middle Africa: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 779,904 t against 468,680 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 311,224 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.7 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Middle Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Middle Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 327,108 t | 304,030 t | 23,078 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 365,803 t | 372,772 t | 6,969 t | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 470,664 t | 650,391 t | 179,727 t | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 511,580 t | 763,685 t | 252,105 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 779,904 t against 468,680 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Middle Africa?
- 311,224 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Middle Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 31st and Middle Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).