Kazakhstan vs Southern Africa: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 581,445 t against 468,680 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 112,765 t.
That makes Southern Africa's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 21st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Southern Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 327,108 t | 306,627 t | 20,482 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 365,803 t | 351,602 t | 14,201 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 470,664 t | 409,383 t | 61,281 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 511,580 t | 539,137 t | 27,557 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Southern Africa?
- Southern Africa, at 581,445 t against 468,680 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Southern Africa?
- 112,765 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Southern Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Southern Africa rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Southern Africa ranks 21st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).