Latvia vs Turkmenistan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 74,789 t against 72,273 t in Latvia, a difference of 2,516 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 100th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,791 t | 82,140 t | 58,349 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 31,398 t | 101,641 t | 70,242 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 59,543 t | 91,032 t | 31,489 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 81,304 t | 102,358 t | 21,053 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 74,789 t against 72,273 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 2,516 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Turkmenistan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 100th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).