Libya vs Slovenia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Libya
- Slovenia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 12,234 t against 11,805 t in Slovenia, a difference of 429 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 137th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,581 t | 10,123 t | 457.42 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 11,600 t | 10,605 t | 995 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 13,356 t | 11,183 t | 2,174 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 12,283 t | 12,121 t | 161.38 t | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Libya or Slovenia?
- Libya, at 12,234 t against 11,805 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Libya and Slovenia?
- 429 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Slovenia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Libya ranks 137th and Slovenia ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).