Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
7.21 million t
in 2023
Russian Federation
4.03 million t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th
Russian Federation rank
6th

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 7.21 million t against 4.03 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 3.18 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.8 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 29 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 3.32 million t 1.85 million t 1.48 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 4.25 million t 2.02 million t 2.23 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 5.97 million t 2.70 million t 3.28 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 7.05 million t 3.82 million t 3.23 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 7.21 million t against 4.03 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
3.18 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/outputs-cropland-nitrogen/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).