Malawi vs Peru: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen

Malawi
204,071 t
in 2023
Peru
210,456 t
in 2023
Malawi rank
60th
Peru rank
58th

Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Malawi
  • Peru
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 210,456 t against 204,071 t in Malawi, a difference of 6,385 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 60th and Peru ranks 58th of 201 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 27,189 t 88,112 t 60,923 t Peru
1970s 38,556 t 93,107 t 54,551 t Peru
1980s 44,791 t 94,663 t 49,872 t Peru
1990s 54,335 t 104,399 t 50,064 t Peru
2000s 88,801 t 158,534 t 69,732 t Peru
2010s 154,707 t 189,995 t 35,288 t Peru
2020s 200,888 t 209,133 t 8,244 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Peru?
Peru, at 210,456 t against 204,071 t in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Peru?
6,385 t, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Peru rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
Malawi ranks 60th and Peru ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).