Mexico vs Oceania: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 2.07 million t against 1.04 million t in Mexico, a difference of 1.03 million t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.0 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Oceania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 449,545 t | 386,284 t | 63,261 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 559,938 t | 511,386 t | 48,552 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 718,768 t | 716,035 t | 2,733 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 769,154 t | 915,016 t | 145,862 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 868,783 t | 1.07 million t | 200,676 t | Oceania |
| 2010s | 999,998 t | 1.30 million t | 300,527 t | Oceania |
| 2020s | 1.05 million t | 1.63 million t | 579,320 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 2.07 million t against 1.04 million t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Oceania?
- 1.03 million t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Oceania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Oceania rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 19th and Oceania ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).