Niger vs Serbia: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Niger
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 236,773 t against 224,918 t in Niger, a difference of 11,855 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Niger ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 130,436 t | 172,321 t | 41,884 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 189,786 t | 198,368 t | 8,582 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 217,676 t | 222,919 t | 5,242 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Niger or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 236,773 t against 224,918 t in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Niger and Serbia?
- 11,855 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Niger ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).