Portugal vs South Sudan: Outputs — Cropland nitrogen
Outputs — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Portugal
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 38,683 t against 37,252 t in Portugal, a difference of 1,431 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34,422 t | 30,894 t | 3,528 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 36,308 t | 36,544 t | 236 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland nitrogen, Portugal or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 38,683 t against 37,252 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland nitrogen between Portugal and South Sudan?
- 1,431 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Portugal and South Sudan rank globally for outputs — cropland nitrogen?
- Portugal ranks 120th and South Sudan ranks 118th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).