Cuba vs Equatorial Guinea: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.23 kg/ha against 2.19 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 185th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.54 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | 6.53 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7.03 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 5.74 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 7.28 kg/ha | 1.36 kg/ha | 5.92 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 4.77 kg/ha | 1.47 kg/ha | 3.3 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3.88 kg/ha | 1.65 kg/ha | 2.23 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 4.14 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.56 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 0.3865 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cuba, at 2.23 kg/ha against 2.19 kg/ha in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Equatorial Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 185th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).