Cuba vs Ethiopia PDR: Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 2.37 kg/ha against 2.23 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 185th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.54 kg/ha | 1.84 kg/ha | 6.7 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 7.03 kg/ha | 1.78 kg/ha | 5.25 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 7.28 kg/ha | 2.29 kg/ha | 4.98 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 6.87 kg/ha | 2.62 kg/ha | 4.25 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 2.37 kg/ha against 2.23 kg/ha in Cuba as of 1992.
- What is the difference in outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cuba and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for outputs — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 185th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Outputs — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).